Show
Pearson correlations involving the chief analysis parameters (the big Four proportions, depressive symptoms, lifestyle satisfaction and you will parenthood pleasure) showed that high degrees of extraversion was notably synchronised with highest amounts of visibility playing, life satisfaction, and lower amounts of depressive symptomatology (come across Dining table dos). Neuroticism and anxiety levels was basically seriously correlated. High neuroticism as well as is actually coordinated that have low levels away from conscientiousness, agreeableness, life satisfaction, and you will parenthood fulfillment. Large amounts of conscientiousness was in fact correlated having lower levels away from depressive symptoms and higher degrees of existence pleasure. Likewise, large degrees of agreeableness was in fact correlated with lower levels regarding depressive symptoms and higher degrees of lifetime satisfaction. High levels of depressive symptomatology was in fact coordinated with lower levels regarding lives pleasure and parenthood pleasure.
Pairwise contrasting showed that gay boys which became dads as a consequence of surrogacy (M = 9
Correlations with the sociodemographic variables that served as controls in our study revealed that being older was significantly correlated with reports of worse physical health (r = ?0.28, p 2 = 0.055. When looking at the univariate effects (see Table 3), life satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 4.827, p = 0.009, ?p 2 = 0.052. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 5.31, SD = 1.16) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 4.70, SD = 1.39) on life satisfaction (p = 0.002), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 5.18, SD = 1.08; p = 0.161) or between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.804).
Table 3. Multivariate Study away from Covariance off Classification (Homosexual Dads through surrogacy, Gay Dads using Heterosexual Dating, and you may Heterosexual Dads) to own Psychological Wellness Concomitants (Age, Host to Delivery, Financial Standing, Self-Ranked Fitness, Self-Ranked Religiousness, Relationship Standing, Amount of People, Children’s Suggest Ages and you will Child’s House Controlled).
Univariate effects also showed that parenthood satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 3.556, p = 0.031, ?p 2 = 0.039. 34, SD = 0.90) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 8.27, SD = 1.72) on parenthood satisfaction (p = 0.018), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 8.03, SD = 1.72; p = 0.870) or between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.216). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on life satisfaction and parenthood satisfaction remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied.
As shown when you look at the Dining table step 3, univariate consequences while doing so showed that depressive symptomology did not significantly differed one of several about three groups, F(2,step one76) = step one.806, p = 0.167.
To evaluate the forecast you to homosexual dads due to surrogacy perform statement large levels of extraversion than possibly heterosexual dads otherwise gay fathers thanks to an effective heterosexual matchmaking, we conducted escort service Davenport univariate analysis out-of covariance (ANCOVA) which have article hoc pairwise evaluations. Analysis group (homosexual fathers by way of surrogacy; homosexual dads who’d getting dads as a consequence of a beneficial heterosexual dating; and heterosexual dads) offered given that independent varying, extraversion supported because created changeable, additionally the 9 sociodemographic details located to help you significantly differ between the fathers’ communities (age, place of beginning, economic reputation, self-ranked health, self-ranked religiousness, relationship position, amount of pupils, youngsters mean ages, and man abode) were utilized just like the covariates.
The results displayed in Table 4 indicated that extraversion significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,179) = 4.182, p = 0.017, ?p 2 = 0.045. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 3.64, SD = 0.72) scored significantly higher on extraversion than heterosexual fathers (M = 2.39, SD = 0.87; p = 0.006). Gay men who became fathers through surrogacy also scored significantly higher on extraversion than gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 3.50, SD = 0.69; p = 0.038). No significant difference was found between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.458). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on extraversion remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied. However, the difference between gay fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship was non-significant.